Histological Evaluation of Extended Criteria Donors: Donor’s Kidney Biopsy and Graft Outcome after 5 Years of Transplantation
Main Article Content
Keywords
extended criteria donors, Karpinski histological score, kidney transplantation, pre-implantation kidney biopsy
Abstract
Pre-transplant kidney biopsy is routinely used to decide whether kidneys from marginal donors should be transplanted as single or double trans-plantation. This is a 5-year extension of the follow-up of a previous study. In that study, graft outcomes were compared retrospectively between a group of 44 recipients of a single kidney graft from an extended criteria donor and a Karpinski histological score of ≤3, and another group of 56 recipients of a single transplant with a Karpinski histological score of 4 or 5. After 5 years of transplantation, there was no difference between the two groups in terms of recipient’s serum creatinine levels (1.8 ± 0.5 vs 1.9 ± 0.6 mg/dL, P = 0.5), creatinine clearance (53 ± 23 vs 49 ± 27.0 mL/min, P = 0.6), or the rates of graft loss (41% vs 49%,P = 0.5). Therefore, the choice between single and double transplant should not be made only on the basis of histological score but should be done together with the evaluation of donor’s clinical parameters, especially the renal function.
References
2. Pascual J, Zamora J, Pirsch JD. A systematic review of kidney transplantation from expanded criteria donors. Am J Kidney Dis. 2008 Sep;52(3):553–86. http://dx.doi.org/10.1053/j.ajkd.2008.06.005
3. Maggiore U, Cravedi P. The marginal kidney donor. Curr Opin Organ Transplant. 2014 Aug;19(4):372–80. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MOT.0000000000000081
4. Stallone G, Infante B, Gesualdo L. Older donors and older recipients in kidney transplantation. J Nephrol. 2010 Sep–Oct;23(Suppl 15): S98–S103.
5. Summers DM, Watson CJ, Pettigrew GJ, Johnson RJ, Collett D, Neuberger JM, et al. Kidney donation after circulatory death (DCD): State of the art. Kidney Int. 2015 Aug;88(2):241–9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ki.2015.88
6. Ferrari P, Weimar W, Johnson RJ, Lim WH, Tinckam KJ. Kidney paired donation: Principles, protocols and programs. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2015 Aug;30(8):1276–85. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ndt/gfu309
7. Böhmig GA, Farkas AM, Eskandary F, Wekerle T. Strategies to overcome the ABO barrier in kidney transplantation. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2015 Dec;11(12):732–47.
8. Humphreys BD. Kidney injury, stem cells and regeneration. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens. 2014;23(1):25–31. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.mnh.0000437332.31418.e0
9. Randhawa P. Role of donor kidney biopsies in renal transplantation. Transplantation. 2001 May 27;71(10):1361–5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00007890-200105270-00001
10. Karpinski J, Lajoie G, Cattran D, et al. Outcome of kidney transplantation from high-risk donors is determined by both structure and function. Transplantation. 1999 Apr 27;67(8):1162–7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00007890-199904270-00013
11. Remuzzi G, Grinyò J, Ruggenenti P, Beatini M, Cole EH, Milford EL, Brenner BM. Early experience with dual kidney transplantation in adults using expanded donor criteria. Double Kidney Transplant Group (DKG). J Am Soc Nephrol. 1999 Dec; 10(12):2591–8.
12. Remuzzi G, Cravedi P, Perna A, et al. Long-term outcome of renal transplantation from older donors. N Engl J Med. 2006 Jan 26;354(4):343–52. http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa052891
13. Carta P, Zanazzi M, Caroti L, Buti E, Mjeshtri A, Di Maria L, et al. Impact of the pre-transplant histological score on 3-year graft outcomes of kidneys from marginal donors: A single-centre study. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2013 Oct;28(10):2637–44. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ndt/gft292
14. Escuredo AS, Sagasta A, Revuelta I, Rodas LM, Paredes D, Musquera M, et al. Histopathological evaluation of pretransplant donor biopsies in expanded criteria donors with high kidney donor profile index: A retrospective observational cohort study. Transpl Int. 2017 Oct;30(10):975–86. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/tri.12966
15. Wang CJ, Wetmore JB, Crary GS, Kasiske BL. The donor kidney biopsy and its implications in predicting graft outcomes: A systematic review. Am J Transplant. 2015 Jul;15(7):1903–14. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ajt.13213